Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Forgot your password?




You can help support this site by making a small donation using either a PayPal account:

or with a major credit card such as:



Click here for details.

Author Topic: opportunities  (Read 2314 times)


  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
« on: January 16, 2012, 10:50:51 PM »
An admittedly stupid question. I am a beginner, crossword and computer. I have been accepted by NYT for one of my puzzles but rejected for ten. I would like to send some to some more reachable targets. What do you suggest?
Along the same lines I use Crossfire. I print it out scan it, print it, and send it in by snail mail to the NYT.
Using Crossfire what do you suggest I do to get to other publishers. I read the LAT that I should use Across Lite but frankly, I don't know how to do that.
So here I am. The puzzles have some potential, but I really don't want to do 100 puzzles and get one or two published by the NYT.


  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: opportunities
« Reply #1 on: January 17, 2012, 08:02:28 AM »
jrob -

I have done much better with the LAT than with the NYT. They also have electronic submission and quicker response and often give a more useful set of feedback (of course, I just got a rejection that was "nice idea, but we recently accepted someone else's version of the same theme" - so it goes).  I don't use Crossfire, but it should be able to save into a format the Rich Norris can read - e-mail him about it, and my guess is you'll get a response pretty quickly.

Some observations: the LAT is much more theme-heavy, with five themed puzzles a week (M-F), almost no gadgets, and then a themeless on Saturday. That makes them more likely to accept a themed puzzle and less likely to accept a themeless than the 2 themes / 2 themelesses per week NYT (calculation based solely on number published and not accounting for number of submissions). I have gotten discouraging comments from Rich Norris about before-and-after themes and about puzzles with circles in some squares. Neither is a death sentence, but those are going to be less successful with the LAT than they might with some other venue, I suspect.

I have had very good experiences with the Chronicle of Higher Education (CHE). Patrick Berry reviews theme ideas quickly. If he likes them, he's helpful with the fill, and if not, he sends a quick and polite rejection, which we all know is better than waiting around (cue Huey Lewis "If this is it...").  If you have a nerdy theme idea, I would definitely run it by the CHE.

Finally, I note that every editor has been nothing but generous and constructive in response to my submissions. My hit rate isn't always very high, but I walk away feeling good even when I fail.

I am hardly a pro and am reporting only my experiences. Yours may be quite different.

- VB


  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
Re: opportunities
« Reply #2 on: January 18, 2012, 09:07:17 AM »
Crossfire has an option to generate a NY Times submission, which I find very helpful.  It is on the Print menu.  Doesn't sound like you are using that.

The LAT will accept Across lite text or Across lite binary files.  I believe the Chronicle does as well.  From Crossfire's menu, go File --> Export as... --> and choose one of the Across lite options (I prefer binary).  If you don't have Across lite, get it (it is free) so you can double check everything.  I also tend to like Across lite's printouts better than Crossfire's, so once you have it in that format you can make nice looking paper copies.


Powered by EzPortal